green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction
See Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction, 75 Conn. App. 814 , 817 A.2d 1274 (petition denied), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 926 , 823 A.2d 1217 (2003); Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction, 93 Conn. App. 736 , 890 A.2d 620 (petition dismissed as abuse of writ), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 914 , 899 A.2d 620 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Al-Janet, LLC v. B & B Home Improvements, LLC
See Torringford Farms Assn., Inc. v. Torrington, 75 Conn. App. 570 , 576 n.8, 816 A.2d 736 (“the party against whom estoppel is claimed must do or say something calculated or intended to induce another party to believe that certain facts exist and to act on that belief’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 924 , 823 A.2d 1217 (2003). 7 Additionally, we note that the plaintiffs’ bald assertion in their brief that the charge materially impacted the jury’s verdict fails to explain adequately the harm caused by this alleged error.
discussed
Cited "see"
Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.
See Torringford Farms Assn., Inc. v. Torrington, 75 Conn. App. 570, 576 , 816 A.2d 736 (“[t]he doctrine of promissory estoppel serves as an alternative basis to enforce a contract in the absence of competing common-law considerations”), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 924 , 823 A.2d 1217 (2003), citing D’Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High School, 202 Conn. 206, 213 , 520 A.2d 217 (1987); see also Stewart v. Cendant Mobility Services Corp., 267 Conn. 96, 110 , 837 A.2d 736 (2003) (concluding that jury reasonably could find that there was no offer for purposes of breach of contra…
discussed
Cited "see"
Decorso v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.
See Torringford Farms Assn., Inc. v. Torrington, 75 Conn. App. 570 , 571 n.2, 816 A.2d 736 (judgment may be affirmed for reason different from that relied on by trial court), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 924 , 823 A.2d 1217 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santa Fuel, Inc. v. Varga
“Although we disagree with the trial court’s reasoning, we affirm the court’s judgment ‘because it reached the right result, even if it did so for the wrong reason.’ Kalas v. Cook, 70 Conn. App. 477, 485 , 800 A.2d 553 (2002); see also Flagg Energy Development Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 244 Conn. 126, 151 , 709 A.2d 1075 (1998).” Torringford Farms Assn., Inc. v. Torrington, 75 Conn. App. 570 , 571 n.2, 816 A.2d 736 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 924 , 823 A.2d 1217 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ARTHUR J. ROCQUE, JR., COMMISSIONER OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
v.
SOUND MANUFACTURING, INC.
v.
SOUND MANUFACTURING, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 15, 2003.
James A. Wade, Craig A. Raabe and Richard M. Fil, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The petition by the defendants Sound Manufacturing, Inc., and Brian E. Cote for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 76 Conn. App. 130 (AC 22551), is denied.