State v. McKiernan, 832 A.2d 66 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. McKiernan, 832 A.2d 66 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Johnson (connappct, 2004-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Johnson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · confidence medium
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the misconduct . . . the frequency of the misconduct . . . the centrality of the misconduct to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 196.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Andriulaitis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Scott , supra, at 730 , 851 A.2d 353 (whether conduct is grossly offensive under contemporary community standards is question for fact finder). " Indrisano avoided first amendment difficulties that would criminalize mere verbal speech by clarifying that a conviction under § 53a-182 must be based on a defendant's conduct rather than on a defendant's statements." State v. McKiernan , 78 Conn.App. 182 , 188, 826 A.2d 1210 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 902 , 832 A.2d 66 (2003).
cited Cited "see" State v. HOWARD F.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lopes, 78 Conn. App. 264, 278 , 826 A.2d 1238 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 902 , 832 A.2d 66 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Doriss (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McKiernan, 78 Conn. App. 182, 195 , 826 A.2d 1210 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 902 , 832 A.2d 66 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
LIAM MCKIERNAN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 9, 2003.
832 A.2d 66
Richard W. Callahan, special public defender, in support of the petition., Proloy K. Das, former special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 182 (AC 22223), is denied.

NORCOTT and PALMER, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.