Charette v. City of Waterbury, 840 A.2d 1172 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Charette v. City of Waterbury, 840 A.2d 1172 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thoma v. Oxford Performance Materials, Inc. (connappct, 2014-09-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Thoma v. Oxford Performance Materials, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Charette v. Waterbury, 80 Conn. App. 232 , 246–47, 248, 834 A.2d 759 (2003) (affirming trial court’s determination that cross-referenced provi- sions created ambiguity in collective bargaining agreement), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 910 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Minor v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Minor, 80 Conn. App. 87, 89 , 832 A.2d 697 , cert. denied, 267 Conn. 907 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Allstate Life Insurance v. BFA Ltd. Partnership
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Charette v. Waterbury, 80 Conn. App. 232, 246-47 , 834 A.2d 759 (2003) (declining to interpolate language in agreement in absence of express reference due to agreement’s specificity otherwise), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 910 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2004); Randolph Construction Co. v. Kings East Corp., supra, 165 Conn. 275 (applying principle in contract modification context).
cited Cited "see" Santana v. City of Hartford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Charette v. Waterbury, 80 Conn. App. 232, 237 , 834 A.2d 759 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 910 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Fine v. Commissioner of Correction, 147 Conn. App. 136 , 81 A.3d 1209 (2013) (discussing canvass requirements for withdrawal with prejudice); see also Mason v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 142 , 144 n.1, 832 A.2d 1216 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 910 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." O'CONNOR v. City of Waterbury
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Charette v. Waterbury, 80 Conn. App. 232, 242-44 , 834 A.2d 759 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 910 , 840 A.2d 1172 (2004); Alexander v. Retirement Board, 57 Conn. App. 751, 757-58 , 750 A.2d 1139 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 902 , 755 A.2d 217 (2000). 11 For purposes of clarity, any reference to the term “annual compensation,” in regard to what the plaintiff is entitled to receive under article twenty-three, § 12, of the agreement, includes the longevity payment owed to the plaintiff under article five of the agreement.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DONALD CHARETTE
v.
CITY OF WATERBURY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 7, 2004.
840 A.2d 1172
Jeffrey R. Bobbin, in support of the petition., Dana B. Lee, in opposition.
Sullivan.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 232 (AC 23408), is denied.

[*911] Decided January 7, 2004 Jeffrey R. Bobbin, in support of the petition. Dana B. Lee, in opposition. SULLIVAN, C. J.,

did not participate in the consider-

ation or decision of this petition.