green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Culver
Moreover, the defendant’s argument is unavailing because it is well established that “[s]ince the legislature has shown that it knows how to bar multiple punishments expressly when it does not intend such punishment . . . the absence of similar language in those statutes provides evidence that the legislature intended cumulative punishments.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 323; see also State v. Perez, 78 Conn. App. 610, 642 , 828 A.2d 626 (2003) (noting several statutes in which legislature expressly prohibited multiple punishments for same incident), cert. d…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jacobson
See State v. Gombert, 80 Conn. App. 477, 490 , 836 A.2d 437 (2003), cert, denied, 267 Conn. 915 , 841 A.2d 220 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Gombert, 80 Conn. App. 477, 489-90 , 836 A.2d 437 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 915 , 841 A.2d 220 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Daniels
(2×)
See State v. Ferraiuolo, 80 Conn. App. 521, 534 , 835 A.2d 1041 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 916 , 841 A.2d 220 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
(2×)
There is no requirement in this state that a potentially inflammatory photograph be essential to the state’s case in order for it to be admissible; rather, the test for determining the admissibility of the challenged evidence is relevancy and not necessity.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Sanchez, 69 Conn. App. 576, 593 , 795 A.2d 597 (2002); see also State v. Ferraiuolo, 80 Conn. App. 521, 530-31 , 835 A.2d 1041 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 916 , 841 A.2d 220 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
VINCENT FERRAIUOLO
v.
VINCENT FERRAIUOLO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 22, 2004.
Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, in support of the petition., Julia K. Conlin, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 521 (AC 23973), is denied.