green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Perez
A determination as to whether a plea has been knowingly and voluntarily entered entails an examination of all of the relevant circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gordon, 69 Conn. App. 691, 696-97 , 796 A.2d 1238 (2002); see Practice Book §§ 39-18 through 39-21. “[W]e conduct a plenary review of the circumstances surrounding [a] plea to determine if it was knowing and voluntary.” State v. Groppi, 81 Conn. App. 310, 313 , 840 A.2d 42 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 916 , 847 A.2d 311 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mordasky
See State v. Groppi, 81 Conn. App. 310, 313 , 840 A.2d 42 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 916 , 847 A.2d 311 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAUL CARRUBBA
v.
EMILY J. MOSKOWITZ
v.
EMILY J. MOSKOWITZ
SC 17157.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 24, 2004.
George W. Kramer, in support of the petition., Robert J. Kor, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 382 (AC 22962), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring this legal malpractice action against the defendant?”