Verspyck v. Franco, 847 A.2d 314 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Verspyck v. Franco, 847 A.2d 314 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bertrand (connappct, 2013-02-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bertrand
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 666-67 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 665-66 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Tutson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 665-66 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004) (interpretation of rule of practice engenders plenary review).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Rodrigues
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because mootness implicates subject matter jurisdiction, it presents a question of law over which our review is plenary. ” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, 291 Conn. 502, 506-507 , 970 A.2d 578 (2009); see also Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton, 81 Conn. App. 662, 664 , 841 A.2d 248 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 919 , 847 A.2d 313 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THEODORE A. VERSPYCK
v.
MICHAEL J. FRANCO
SC 17160.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 30, 2004.
847 A.2d 314
Louis Ciccarello, in support of the petition., John Wayne Fox and Patricia M. Gaug, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 646 (AC 23813), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In this action for vexatious litigation, did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the trial court improperly had rejected the defendant Marilyn P. Altsheler’s special defense of reliance on the advice of counsel?”