green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See generally 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 83 Conn. App. 167, 174 , 851 A.2d 1175 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 567 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Nicholson v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Nicholson, 83 Conn. App. 439 , 850 A.2d 1089 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Bishop v. Zoning Board of Appeals
See 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 83 Conn. App. 167, 177-78 , 851 A.2d 1175 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 567 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1961), giving one definition of “dead end” as “cul-de-sac.” See also 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 83 Conn. App. 167, 173-74 , 851 A.2d 1175 (ordinary meaning of cul-de-sac “is a blind alley or a street open at one end only, or a street closed at one end, usually with a turnaround at the closed end, which does not describe ... a loop road that allows traffic to flow in two directions”), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 567 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Driska v. Pierce
Enfield v. Enfield Shade Tobacco, 265 Conn. 376, 380 , 828 A.2d 596 (2003); see also 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 83 Conn. App. 167, 175 , 851 A.2d 1175 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 567 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 596 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002), on appeal after remand, 83 Conn. App. 439 , 850 A.2d 1089 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
200 ASSOCIATES, LLC
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF THOMPSON
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF THOMPSON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 8, 2004.
William H. St. Onge, in support of the petition., Robin Messier Pearson, in opposition.
Borden.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 167 (AC 24116), is denied.
BORDEN, J.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.