Beucler v. Lloyd, 859 A.2d 567 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Beucler v. Lloyd, 859 A.2d 567 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Papineau (connappct, 2018-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Papineau
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henderson , 83 Conn. App. 739 , 748-49, 853 A.2d 115 (evidence of nature of relationship between alleged coconspirators relevant to issue of existence and object of conspiracy), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 913 , 859 A.2d 572 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Wells
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henderson, 83 Conn. App. 739, 748-49 , 853 A.2d 115 (evidence of nature of relationship between alleged coconspirators relevant to issue of existence and object of conspiracy), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 913 , 859 A.2d 572 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROBERT BEUCLER
v.
MICHAEL J. LLOYD
SC 17260.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 2004.
859 A.2d 567
Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition., Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights[*914] under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.