Campion v. Bd. of Aldermen, 867 A.2d 837 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Campion v. Bd. of Aldermen, 867 A.2d 837 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals (connappct, 2006-01-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
An applicant for a variance must show that, because of some peculiar characteristic of his property, the strict application of the zoning regulation produces an unusual hardship, as opposed to the general impact which the regulation has on other properties in the zone.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Reid v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 235 Conn. 850, 856 , 670 A.2d 1271 (1996); see also Campion v. Board of Aldermen, 85 Conn. App. 820, 840-42 , 859 A.2d 586 (2004), cert. granted on other grounds, 272 Conn. 920 , 867 A.2d 837 (2005); R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUSAN C. CAMPION
v.
BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NEW HAVEN
SC 17347.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 27, 2005.
867 A.2d 837
Austin K. Wolf, Barbara M. Schellenberg and Frank S. Marcucci, in support of the petition., John M. Gesmonde, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the defendants Anthony DelMonaco Family Limited Partnership, Antonio DelMonaco and Anna DelMonaco for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 820 (AC 24360), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there is no source of enabling authority for § 65 of the New Haven zoning ordinance?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.