State v. Nieves, 882 A.2d 679 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Nieves, 882 A.2d 679 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Patel (connappct, 2019-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nieves, 89 Conn. App. 410 , 414–15, 873 A.2d 1066 (reviewing, pursuant to Golding, unpreserved claim that court failed to hold hearing and require witness personally to invoke privilege against self-incrimination), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 906 , 882 A.2d 679 (2005). 7 The defendant makes only passing reference in his appellate briefs to his right to confrontation as the constitutional right violated. 8 Niraj also was arrested on September 11, 2013.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nieves, 89 Conn. App. 410 , 414–15, 873 A.2d 1066 (reviewing, pursuant to Golding, unpreserved claim that court failed to hold hearing and require witness personally to invoke privilege against self-incrimination), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 906 , 882 A.2d 679 (2005). 7 The defendant makes only passing reference in his appellate briefs to his right to confrontation as the constitutional right violated. 8 Niraj also was arrested on September 11, 2013.
discussed Cited "see" Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota, N.A. v. Morgan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Gilmore, 89 Conn. App. 164 , 171 n.9, 875 A.2d 546 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 906 , 882 A.2d 681 (2005). 10 Practice Book § 63-1 (c) (1) provides in relevant part: “If a motion is filed within the appeal period that, if granted, would render the judgment, decision or acceptance of the verdict ineffective, either a new twenty-day period or applicable statutory time period for filing the appeal shall begin on the day that notice of the ruling is given on the last such outstanding motion ....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ANEUDI NIEVES
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 12, 2005.
882 A.2d 679
Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., James A. Killen, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 410 (AC 24556), is denied.