B P 7 v. Bureau of State Lottery, 225 Mich. App. 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
B P 7 v. Bureau of State Lottery, 225 Mich. App. 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Petition of Singer Asset Finance (njsuperctappdiv, 1998-05-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Petition of Singer Asset Finance
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1998 · signal: but see · confidence high
Lottery Grand Prize Drawing, 643 So. 2d 843 (La.Ct.App. 1994); Meyers v. State Lottery Com'n, 34 Ohio App. 3d 232 , 517 N.E. 2d 1029 (1986) [2] ; contra Watson v. Lottery Bureau, 224 Mich.App. 639 , 569 N.W. 2d 878 (1997); but see B P 7 v. Michigan Bureau of State Lottery, 225 Mich.App. 811 , 572 N.W.2d 663 (1997)(criticizing Watson).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
B P 7
v.
Bureau of State Lottery and Gewarges v. Bureau of State Lottery
Docket No. 192826; Docket No. 192827.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Sep 12, 1997.
225 Mich. App. 811
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(H) to resolve the conflict between this case and Watson v Michigan Bureau of State Lottery, 224 Mich App 639 (1997).

The Court further orders that the opinion in this case released September 9, 1997, is hereby vacated.

The appellant may file a supplemental brief within 28 days of the clerk’s certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant’s brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.