In re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Becker, 97 Nev. 20 (Nev. 1981). · Go Syfert
In re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Becker, 97 Nev. 20 (Nev. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: KAUR VS. SINGH (nev, 2020-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) KAUR VS. SINGH
Nev. · 2020 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue . . . .
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) DOLORFINO VS. UNIV. MED. CTR. OF S. NEVADA (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue. . . .
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) DOLORFINO VS. UNIV. MED. CTR. OF S. NEVADA (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue. . . .
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) WEST SUNSET 2050 TRUST VS. NATIONSTAR MORTG., LLC (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
Nev. · 2018 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue. . . .
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) WEST SUNSET 2050 TRUST VS. NATIONSTAR MORTG., LLC (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
Nev. · 2018 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue. . . .
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) NGUYEN VS. BOYNES (CHILD CUSTODY) (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
Nev. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dolorfino v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev.
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Frederic & Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust v. MacDonald Highlands Realty, LLC
Nev. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) W. Sunset 2050 Trust v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC
Nev. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) NGUYEN VS. BOYNES (CHILD CUSTODY)
Nev. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Discount Tire Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. (2×) also: Cited "see"
Nev. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Stevens v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Nev. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue . . . .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ditech Financial LLC v. Kal-Mor-Usa, LLC
Nev. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ditech Financial LLC v. Tyrone & In-Ching, LLC
Nev. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue.
discussed Cited "see" De Hines Vs. Rels Valuation
Nev. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Nat'l Bank of Neu. v. Ron Rudin Realty Co., 97 Nev. 20, 24 , 623 P.2d 558, 560 (1981) (declining to reach a subsequent issue when a primary issue is dispositive); see also Ozawa v. Vision Airlines, Inc., 125 Nev. 556, 563 , 216 P.3d 788, 793 (2009) (treating a party's failure to respond to an argument as a concession that the argument is meritorious).
cited Cited "see" Reed Vs. Soligent Distrib., Llc
Nev. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Nat7 Bank of Nev. v. Ron Rudin Realty Co., 97 Nev. 20, 24 , 623 P.2d 558, 560 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" ROSENBERG LIVING TRUST VS. MACDONALD HIGHLANDS REALTY, LLC C/W 70478 (2×)
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Nat'l Bank of Nev. v. Ron Rudin Realty Co., 97 Nev. 20, 24, 623 P.2d 558, 560 (1981) ("In that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue . .”).
discussed Cited "see" ROSENBERG LIVING TRUST VS. MACDONALD HIGHLANDS REALTY, LLC C/W 70478 (2×)
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Nat'l Bank of Nev. v. Ron Rudin Realty Co., 97 Nev. 20, 24 , 623 P.2d 558, 560 (1981) ("In that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue . .”).
discussed Cited "see" ROSENBERG LIVING TRUST VS. MACDONALD HIGHLANDS REALTY, LLC C/W 70478 (2×)
Nev. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Nat'l Bank of Nev. v. Ron Rudin Realty Co., 97 Nev. 20, 24 , 623 P.2d 558, 560 (1981) ("In that our determination of the first issue is dispositive of this case, we do not reach the second issue . .”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Against ALFRED BECKER, Attorney at Law
No. 12694.
Nevada Supreme Court.
Feb 5, 1981.
97 Nev. 20

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

The State Bar of Nevada, Disciplinary Board, Southern District, has petitioned this court to impose the stated form of discipline contained in the conditional plea of guilty tendered by Alfred Becker. The conditional plea of guilty has been approved by the appropriate hearing panel, as provided by SCR 113(1).

Good cause appearing, the conditional plea of guilty is approved and the petition is granted. Accordingly, we

ORDER that Alfred Becker be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, with credit on said suspension to be given for the time that Mr. Becker has been suspended by order of this court dated July 11, 1980.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following the expiration of the two-year suspension, Mr. Becker may pursue reinstatement pursuant to SCR 116, at which time he shall have the burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that he has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission to practice law in this state, and that his resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the Bar, to the administration of justice, or to the public interest.