discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Weir, E. See Commonwealth v. Blakeney, 631 Pa. 1, 46 , 108 A.3d 739, 766 (2014), cert. denied, 576 U.S. 1009 , 135 S.Ct. 2817 , 192 L.Ed.2d 857 (2015) (explaining that while Pennsylvania appellate courts historically have liberally construed materials filed by pro se litigants, pro se status does not entitle litigant to any special benefit, and court cannot be expected to become litigant’s counsel or find more in written pro se submission than is fairly conveyed therein).

discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Carter, N. See Commonwealth v. Blakeney, 631 Pa. 1, 46 , 108 A.3d 739, 766 (2014), cert. denied, 576 U.S. 1009 , 135 S.Ct. 2817 , 192 L.Ed.2d 857 (2015) (explaining that while Pennsylvania appellate courts historically have liberally construed materials filed by pro se litigants, pro se status does not entitle litigant to any special benefit, and court cannot be expected to become litigant’s counsel or find more in written pro se submission than is fairly conveyed therein).