green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See Beland v. United States, 128 F.2d 795 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 676 , 63 S.Ct. 157 , 87 L.Ed. 543 (1942). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. Gray
See Eyer v. Brady, 128 F. 2 d 1012 (4 Cir. 1942), certiorari denied 317 U.S. 679 , 63 S.Ct. 157 , 87 L.Ed. 545 (1942) and Hawkins v. State, 102 Tex. Cr.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Porter v. Singletary
See also, Beland v. United States, 128 F.2d 795 (5th Cir.1942), certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 676 , 63 S.Ct. 157 , 87 L.Ed. 543 . 1 Petitioner is not entitled to habeas corpus relief on ground VI.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Chavez
Although the exact dimensions of these rights have not been fully articulated, courts have held that they do not include the right to trial by jury, see Turnbough v. Wyrick, 551 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1977); James v. Twomey, 466 F.2d 718 (7th Cir. 1972), nor the right to grand jury indictment, United States v. Baca, 451 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1971); see also Beland v. United States, 128 F.2d 795 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 676 , 63 S.Ct. 157 , 87 L.Ed. 543 , reh’g denied 317 U.S. 710 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 566 (1942).” United States v. Inendino, supra. In affirming the district court, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Inendino
Although the exact dimensions of these rights have not been fully articulated, courts have held that they do not include the right to trial by jury, see Turnbough v. Wyrick, 551 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1977); James v. Twomey, 466 F.2d 718 (7th Cir. 1972), 5 nor the right to grand jury indictment, United States v. Baca, 451 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1971); see also, Beland v. United States, 128 F.2d 795 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 676 , 63 S.Ct. 157 , 87 L.Ed. 543 , reh’g denied 317 U.S. 710 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 566 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coverly v. State
See also McDonald v. Hudspeth, 129 F. 2d 196 , certiorari denied 317 U. S. 665 , 87 L. ed. 535, 63 S. Ct. 75 , rehearing denied 317 U. S. 709 , 87 L. ed. 565, 63 S. Ct. 157 , and Tiller v. Hudspeth, 131 F. 2d 188 , holding that where the same transaction constitutes a violation of two statutory provisions, the test to be applied in determining whether there are two offenses is whether each required proof of a fact which the other does not.” ( 178 Kan. 554 at 555-6 .) The offense of escaping from jail may well be committed without an assault, and an assault with intent to escape may be commit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wagner v. Edmondson
See also McDonald v. Hudspeth, 129 F. 2d 196 , certiorari denied 317 U. S. 665 , 87 L. ed. 535, 63 S. Ct. 75 , rehearing denied 317 U. S. 709 , 87 L. ed. 565, 63 S. Ct. 157 , and Tiller v. Hudspeth, 131 F. 2d 188 , holding that where the same transaction constitutes a violation of two statutory provisions, the test to be applied in determining whether there are two *556 offenses is whether each requires proof of a fact which the other does not.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
Hudspeth, Warden
v.
Hudspeth, Warden
No. 382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1942.
Published
Petition for rehearing denied. The “Petition for Court Order” is also denied.