Agric. Prorate Comm'n v. Mut. Orange Distributors, 318 U.S. 744 (1943). · Go Syfert
Search
Agric. Prorate Comm'n v. Mut. Orange Distributors, 318 U.S. 744 (1943). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Riner (vawd, 2005-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Riner
W.D. Va. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363, 367 , 318 U.S. 744 , 63 S.Ct. 573 , 87 L.Ed. 838 (1943).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Southern California Edison Co.
E.D. Cal. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Opposition at 4. “[I]n cases where the rights and duties of the United States find their roots in federal sources, a federal court is not bound by Erie to apply state law.” Montana v. United States, 124 F.3d 1269, 1274 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363, 366 , 318 U.S. 744 , 63 S.Ct. 573 , 87 L.Ed. 838 (1943) and Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Besse v. General Motors Corp.
D.S.C. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court first found that the interest in that case was “uniquely federal because it involves health benefits for federal employees across the country.” Id. at 78 ; see also Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363, 366-67 , 318 U.S. 744 , 63 S.Ct. 573 , 87 L.Ed. 838 (1943) (holding that federal common law governs the duties and obligations of the federal government under contracts to which it is a party); Westfall v. Erwin, 484 U.S. 292, 295 , 108 S.Ct. 580 , 98 L.Ed.2d 619 (1988) (federal common law governs the scope of civil liability for federal officials performing their d…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United States
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 , 318 U.S. 744 , 63 S.Ct. 573 , 87 L.Ed. 838 (1943). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Agricultural Prorate Commission of California
v.
Mutual Orange Distributors
No. 288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1943.
318 U.S. 744
Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union [*745] Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526.

Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.