Byerly v. Comm'r, 329 U.S. 727 (1946). · Go Syfert
Search
Byerly v. Comm'r, 329 U.S. 727 (1946). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Halliburton Company v. The Dow Chemical Company (ca10, 1975-04-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946 1986 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Halliburton Company v. The Dow Chemical Company
10th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co., 1 Cir., 151 F.2d 886, 891 , rev’d on other grounds, 154 F.2d 729 , cert. denied 329 U.S. 741 , 67 S.Ct. 79 , 91 L.Ed. 639 .
discussed Cited "see" Edward M. Goemans v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2×)
7th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Byerly v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 154 F.2d 879 , certiorari denied 329 U.S. 727 , 67 S.Ct. 79 , 91 L.Ed. 629 ; McCutchin v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 159 F.2d 472 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Samuel H. Salisbury, as Under the Will of Ora S. Hitchcock v. United States (2×)
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare DeCastro's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 155 F.2d 254 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 727 , 67 S.Ct. 82 , 91 L.Ed. 630 (1946); Commerce Trust Co. v. United States, 167 F.Supp. 643 (W.D.Mo.1958). 25 Further, while the majority goes to great length to demonstrate the importance of viewing the critical words of the will in their proper context, and attempts to distinguish the major cases on the grounds that additional broadening instructions appeared in the instrument, no consideration has been given to the fact that the trustee in the instant case in construing his own pow…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Byerly
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1946.
329 U.S. 727
Lee E. Joslyn, Jr. and Alan W. Joslyn for petitioner. Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General McGregor, Sewall Key, Robert N. Anderson and William Robert Koerner for respondent.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.