discussed Cited "see" Golden v. State Board of Law Examiners See note 12, supra. To the same effect as to the privileges and immunities clauses as Lockwood and Hawkins, see Starr v. State Board of Law Examiners, 159 F.2d 305 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 830 , 67 S.Ct. 1348 , 91 L.Ed. 1844 (1947); Mitchell v. Greenough, 100 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 306 U.S. 659 , 59 S.Ct. 788 , 83 L.Ed. 1056 (1939); Ricci v. State Board of Law Examiners, 427 F.Supp. 611, 617 (E.D.Pa.1977); West Virginia State Bar v. Bostic, 351 F.Supp. 1118, 1121 (S.D.W.Va.1972); Mackay v. Nesbett, 285 F.Supp. 498, 503 (D.Alaska 1968), aff'd, 412 F.2d 84…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. McQuaid See Hawkins v United States, 158 F2d 652 (CA DC Cir) (1946), cert den 331 US 830 , 67 S Ct 1347 , 91 L ed 1844. 2 However, we need not look into the possibility that Singer’s statement did not induce the accused’s confession.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vincent P. Delle Chiaie v. Philip J. Picard, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Norfolk Compare Stein v. New York, 1952, 346 U.S. 156, 182 , 73 S.Ct. 1077 , 97 L.Ed. 1522 , with Hawkins v. United States, 1946, 81 U.S. App.D.C. 376, 158 F.2d 652, 653-654 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 830 , 67 S.Ct. 1347 , 91 L.Ed. 1844 .