Bunn v. North Carolina, 336 U.S. 942 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
Bunn v. North Carolina, 336 U.S. 942 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
172 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 59 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Infirst Bank v. Jager (In re Jager) (pawb, 2019-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949 1987 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Infirst Bank v. Jager (In re Jager)
Bankr. W.D. Pa. · 2019 · confidence medium
Specifically, the Supreme Court held that Rule 60(b)(6)"vests power in courts adequate to enable them to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice." Klapprott , at 615, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 .
discussed Cited "see" SER The First State Bank v. Hon. F. Jane Hustead, Judge
W. Va. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Int’l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 670-71 (2d Cir.1977) (‘While any motion under Rule 60(b) is addressed to the discretion of the trial court ... this discretion is especially broad under subdivision (6), because relief under it is to be granted when ‘appropriate to accomplish justice,’ Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (plurality opinion of Black, J.), modified on other grounds, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); see 11 C.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Coletta
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Bd. v. Gray, 1 F.3d 262, 266 (4th Cir.1993); see generally Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613-14 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949) (party established existence of extraordinary circumstances where he was prevented from making a timely appeal of judgment for four years because of incarceration, ill health and other factors beyond his reasonable control).
cited Cited "see" Henriquez v. Astrue
D. Mass. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); Cotto v. United States, 993 F.2d 274, 277-78 (1st Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Mandowsky v. Dresdner Bank AG
D.N.J. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949); Liljeberg v. Health Servs.
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. American Overseas Marine Corp.
unknown court · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (noting that Rule 60(b)(6) provides courts the authority “adequate to enable them to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice”); Harrell v. DCS Equip.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. 59.88 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Eastham (2×)
D. Mass. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949); Baus, 834 F.2d at 1122 .
cited Cited "see" Maduakolam v. Columbia University
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 389 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , judgment modified, 336 U.S. 942 (1949).
cited Cited "see" Maduakolam v. Columbia University
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 389 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , judgment modified, 336 U.S. 942 (1949).
discussed Cited "see" Suerth v. Mapson (In Re Mapson)
Bankr. C.D. Ill. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. U.S., 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949), modified 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); U.S. v. Baus, 834 F.2d 1114, 1121-22 (1st Cir.1987); United States v. Karahalias, 205 F.2d 331, 333 (2d Cir.1953). 10 .
cited Cited "see" Canton Oil v. DIST. COURT, SECOND JUD. DIST.
Colo. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, i.e., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949).
cited Cited "see" Canton Oil Corp. v. District Court In & For Second Judicial District
Colo. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, i.e., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949).
discussed Cited "see" Midway Oil Corp. v. Guess (2×)
Wyo. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , judgment modified by 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); Compton v. Alton Steamship Co., supra; Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc., Wyo., 639 P.2d 1385 (1982); Westring v. Cheyenne National Bank, Wyo., 393 P.2d 119 (1964); Lake v. Lake, 63 Wyo. 375 , 182 P.2d 824 (1947); Giles v. Giles, Ala., 404 So.2d 649 (1981).
cited Cited "see" Dunlop v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
cited Cited "see" 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 290, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,484 John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., William E. Fitzgerald, Benedict Martorana and Alex E. Penman, Movants-Appellants
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949). 41 My quarrel with the majority may be summarized briefly.
cited Cited "see" Cockerham v. Zikratch
Ariz. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
discussed Cited "see" Mervin C. McKinney v. Joseph Boyle
9th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 1949, 335 U.S. 601, 613-615 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 ; Cavalliotis v. Salomon, 2 Cir., 1966, 357 F.2d 157, 159 ; L.
discussed Cited "see" Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/s
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); United States v. Karahalias, 205 F.2d 331 (2d Cir. 1953); Kathe v. United States, 284 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1960); Davis v. Wadsworth Construction Co., 27 F.R.D. 1 (E.D.Pa.1961).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Eichenlaub (2×)
2d Cir. · 1950 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 757, 760 , 164 A.L.R. 387 ; Williston, Contracts, § 95A and cases cited; Thoroughgood’s Case, 2 Coke 9a; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 324 , 48 S.Ct. 311, 314 , 72 L.Ed. 587 . 3 Those authorities would seem to have peculiar force in denaturalization proceedings; see Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Austin v. Donahoe
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Norris v. Salazar, 277 F.R.D. 22, 24, 26-28 (D.D.C.2011) (relief under Rule 60(b)(6) granted where plaintiffs case was dismissed due to counsel’s neglect, and where plaintiff filed motion for relief three months after learning of dismissal); see also More v. Lew, 34 F.Supp.3d at 30 (“A delay of several years, like that in this case, has only been found reasonable when plaintiff bore no fault for the delay and filed a motion as soon as feasible.”) (citing Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pramco, LLC Ex Rel. CFSC Consortium, LLC v. Mujica
D.P.R. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Motions brought under Rule 60(b) are committed to the district court’s sound discretion ... the trial court’s exercise of discretion must be colored by a recognition that, because Rule 60(b) is a vehicle for extraordinary relief, motions invoking the rule should be granted ‘only under exceptional circumstances.’ ” Miranda v. American Airlines, 176 F.R.D. 438, 440 (D.Puerto Rico 1998), quoting Lepore v. Vidockler, 792 F.2d 272, 274 (1st Cir.1986); see also Klapprott v. U.S., 335 U.S. 601 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949); and Gray v. Estelle, 574 F.2d 209, 215 (5t…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Annie Truett, Glenda & Marvin Plunk v. Wayne Bowman
Tenn. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613-14 , modified at 336 U.S. 942 (1949) (granting relief because the defendant’s failure to defend resulted from the disappearance of his attorney, not the defendant’s own negligence).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bryan v. Butler
N.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Sony Corp. v. Elm State Elec., Inc., 800 F.2d 317, 320 (2d Cir.1986); Enron, 10 F.3d at 96 ; Meehan, 652 F.2d at 277 ; See also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390-91 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949), modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
As a remedial provision, Rule 60(b) is to be “liberally construed for the purpose of doing substantial justice.” 7 Moore, supra, ¶¶ 60.18[8], 60.19; see also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 609 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 387 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1951 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , as modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 . 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bunn
v.
North Carolina
No. 643.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1949.
336 U.S. 942
Petitioner pro se. Harry McMullan, Attorney General of North Carolina, and T. W. Bruton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam,:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.