News Syndicate Co. v. Mattox, 338 U.S. 858 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
News Syndicate Co. v. Mattox, 338 U.S. 858 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Sonneborn (ctd, 1985-11-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" National Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Sonneborn
D. Conn. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mattox v. News Syndicate Co., 176 F.2d 897, 900 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 858 , 70 S.Ct. 100 , 94 L.Ed. 525 (1949) (L.
cited Cited "see" Rel-Reeves, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, 31 C.J.S., Sec. 150, and, specifically, American Republic Corp. v. Houston Oil Co., 173 F. 2d 728 (5th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 858 ; Orr v. Mutual Life Ins.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Morton Sobell
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
But even if the Supreme Court would now deem Grünewald to be constitutionally grounded, a sufficient answer here would be that any constitutional implications must be limited to the person whose claim of privilege was later used against him. “ [T] he privilege is that of the witness himself, and not that of the party on trial.” McAlister v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 91 , 26 S.Ct. 385 , 50 L.Ed. 671 (1906); see Sachs v. Government of the Canal Zone, 176 F.2d 292 -296 (5 Cir.), cert. denied 338 U.S. 858 , 70 S.Ct. 100 , 94 L.Ed. 525 (1949); 8 Wig-more, Evidence (McNaughton rev. 1961), pp. 414-41…
cited Cited "see" Nagoya Assocs., Inc. v. Esquire, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mattox v. News Syndicate Co., 2 Cir., 176 F.2d 899 , 12 A.L.R.2d 988 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 858 , 70 S.Ct. 100 , 94 L.Ed. 525 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
News Syndicate Co., Inc.
v.
Mattox
No. 275.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 24, 1949.
338 U.S. 858
Stuart N. Updike for petitioner. Louis B. Fine for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.