green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…here is no right to cut off questioning where the suspect is not in custody.
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Slwooko v. State
(2×)
here is no right to cut off questioning where the suspect is not in custody.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re B.B., Juvenile
No. 96-301.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
Jun 27, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Alaska (2)
Mother appeals from an order of the family court, which requires her to reimburse the State in the amount of $339 for assigned counsel to represent her child who is an adverse party in this juvenile proceeding. She argues that reimbursement by her, the adverse party, creates a conflict of interest for the attorney representing the child. We disagree. Because counsel is assigned by the court and reimbursement is made to the State, we conclude that there is no potential for a conflict of interest arising from the reimbursement requirement.
Affirmed.