State v. Lanoue, 378 A.2d 1077 (R.I. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lanoue, 378 A.2d 1077 (R.I. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Guy Lanoue
M. P. No. 77-315.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Sep 30, 1977.
378 A.2d 1077
Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Nancy Marks Rahmes, Special Assistant
Published

Because he failed to follow the avenue of direct appeal, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from this court. However, before we can address the issue of the writ, certain questions of fact must be established. Because this court cannot take testimony in a proceeding of this nature, the case is remanded to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing. See Lonardo v. Langlois, 98 R.I. 493, 205 A.2d 19 (1964).

After a hearing and fact findings, the Superior Court shall return the record to this court.