Hayward v. Premo, 134 S. Ct. 101 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Hayward v. Premo, 134 S. Ct. 101 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Noguera v. Davis (cacd, 2017-11-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Noguera v. Davis
C.D. Cal. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See James v. Borg , 24 F.3d at 26 ("Conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of specific facts do not warrant habeas relief."); Jones v. Gomez , 66 F.3d at 205 (habeas relief not warranted where claims for relief are unsupported by facts); see also Gentry v. Sinclair , 705 F.3d 884 , 899-900 (9th Cir.) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on counsel's failure to offer mitigating evidence of petitioner's mental condition because petitioner failed to provide declaration or affidavit from counsel addressing reason counsel failed to present such evidence), …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael James HAYWARD
v.
Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.
No. 12–10316..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2013.
134 S. Ct. 101
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.