Pollock v. Oregon, 134 S. Ct. 123 (2013).

Pollock v. Oregon, 134 S. Ct. 123 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 14.0 score

“the choice whether and to what extent to cross-examine a witness always requires a weighing of benefits and risks. but where, as here, the victim has taken the witness stand and is available for cross-examination, the confrontation clause is not implicated.”

2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: State v. Hudspeth (orctapp, 2018-06-20)

Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗

examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Hudspeth

Or. Ct. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

the choice whether and to what extent to cross-examine a witness always requires a weighing of benefits and risks. but where, as here, the victim has taken the witness stand and is available for cross-examination, the confrontation clause is not implicated.