green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Phillippe Tanguy, 13500 Air Express, L.L.C. and 13500 Air Express, L.P., and PTRE Holdings. L.P. v. William G. West, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Richard Davis, Debtor, and Eva S. Engelhart, Receiver
See Tanguy v. West, 538 Fed.Appx. 440 (5th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1002 , 187 L.Ed.2d 851 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Derosa-Grund
See, e.g., Badami v. Sears (In re AFY, Inc.), 461 B.R. 541, 547-48 (8th Cir. BAP 2012) (“Unless and until the Supreme Court visits other provisions of Section 157(b)(2), we take the Supreme Court at its word and hold that the balance of the authority granted to bankruptcy judges by Congress in 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2) is constitutional.”); see also In re Davis, 538 Fed — U.S. - , 134 S.Ct. 1002 , 187 L.Ed.2d 851 (2014) (“[Wjhile it is true that Stem invalidated 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(C) with respect to ‘counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate,’ …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.
See Abbott GmbH & Co., KG v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., 971 F.Supp.2d 171, 175 (D.Mass.2013); see also Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc., 717 F.3d 1255, 1261 (Fed.Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1013 , 187 L.Ed.2d 851 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Wright
See, e.g., Badami v. Sears (In re AFY, Inc.), 461 B.R. 541, 547-18 (8th Cir. BAP 2012) (“Unless and until the Supreme Court visits other provisions of Section 157(b)(2), we take the Supreme Court at its word and hold that the balance of the authority granted to bankruptcy judges by Congress in 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2) is constitutional.”); see also In re Davis, 538 Fed.Appx. 440, 443 (5th Cir.2013), cert. denied sub nom, Tanguy v. W., - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1002 , 187 L.Ed.2d 851 (2014) (“[Wjhile it is true that Stem invalidated 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(C) with respect to ‘counterclaims by …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc., 628 F.3d 1359, 1376 (Fed.Cir.2010) (“As we have repeatedly explained, litigants waive their right to present new claim construction disputes if they are raised for the first time after trial.”) (internal citation omitted); see also Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc., 717 F.3d 1255, 1262 (Fed.Cir.2013) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1013 , 187, 187 L.Ed.2d 851 (2014) (holding that a defendant cannot mount a post-trial attack on a claim construction to which it had agreed).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas F. ATWELL, Jr., of the Estate of Thomas F. Atwell
v.
JOHN CRANE, INC.
v.
JOHN CRANE, INC.
No. 13–586..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2014.
Published
Case below, 63 A.3d 841.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.