green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
FishDish, LLP v. VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc.
If it does, then the district court should have addressed this issue before the non- jurisdictional issue of equitable mootness because “a court cannot issue a ruling on the merits when it has no jurisdiction because to do so is, by very definition, for a court to act ultra vires.” Brownback v. King, 141 S. Ct. 740, 749 (2021) (cleaned up); see In re AFY, 734 F.3d 810, 816 (8th Cir. 2013), cert. denied sub. nom Sears v. Badami, 572 U.S. 1117 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nivis Martin
See United States v. Stargell, 738 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.2013) (“The increased risk of loss presented by fraudulent terms is sufficient to ‘affect’ a financial institution [in the context of wire fraud].”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2289 , 189 L.Ed.2d 178 (2014); United States v. Serpico, 320 F.3d 691, 694-95 (7th Cir.2003) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Candelario Hernandez JIMENEZ
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–7250..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2014.
Published
Case below, 537 Fed.Appx. 678.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.