green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
“the plaintiffs concede that they can point to no case establishing that a sheriff cannot . there being no clearly established right, the defend- ants are entitled to qualified immunity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Todd Cibulka v. City of Madison
the plaintiffs concede that they can point to no case establishing that a sheriff cannot . there being no clearly established right, the defend- ants are entitled to qualified immunity.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Lockhart
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The district court erred in separately considering Lockhart’s two peti- tions for relief and concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to vacate the _____________________ 2 See, e.g., United States v. Walker, 78 F.3d 582, 582 (5th Cir. 1996) (holding that the movant's “challenge to the ordered restitution and accompanying claim of ineffective assistance of counsel do not pertain to unlawful custody and, accordingly, fall outside the scope of section 2255”). 4 Case: 24-11081 Document: 72-1 Page: 5 Date Filed: 01/29/2026 No. 24-11081 restitution order.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Bulso
See Denmark v. Tzimas, 871 F.Supp. 261, 267 (E.D.La.1994) (finding Calder inapplicable because the issue at hand was a libelous article that focused on the “English activities of an English citizen”), aff'd, 78 F.3d 582 (5th Cir.1996) (unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stella Morrison v. Layne Walker
Even assuming Harper survives Mí-reles, Morrison’s allegations of Walker’s personal vendetta against her do not sufficiently allege that “it is beyond reasonable dispute that [Walker] ... acted out of personal motivation and ... used his judicial office as an offensive weapon.” Harper, 638 F.2d at 859 ; see also Sleeman v. Brazoria Cty., 78 F.3d 582 , 1996 WL 60605, at *4 (5th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (unpublished) 6 (distinguishing its facts from the facts of Harper).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U.S
v.
Brown
v.
Brown
94-20913.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 8, 1996.
Unpublished
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
U.S.
v.
Brown[*]
NO. 94-20913
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb 02, 1996
Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CR-H-92-25-8
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2