McCain v. Bank of Am. N.A., 602 F. App'x 836 (D.C. Cir. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
McCain v. Bank of Am. N.A., 602 F. App'x 836 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Terrylyn McCAIN
v.
BANK OF AMERICA N.A.
No. 14-7016.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 18, 2015.
602 F. App'x 836
Terrylyn McCain, Stockton, CA, pro se., Thomas R. Lynch, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Joseph Paul Esposito, Hunton & Williams LLP, Haig V. Kalbian, Esquire, Denise Michelle Douglas, Kalbian Hagerty LLP, Washington, DC, William Scott Shepard, Miller Starr Regalia, Walnut Creek, CA, Stephen A. Horvath, Bancroft McGavin Horvath & Judkins, PC, Fairfax, VA, for Appellees.
Griffith, Kavanaugh, Wilkins.
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the ree- . ord from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 30, 2014, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined venue for appellant’s claims does not lie in the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The district court also did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s complaint rather than transferring it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 789 (D.C.Cir.1983).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.