Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. Am. Loan & Trust Co., 84 F. 18 (1897). · Go Syfert
Search
Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. Am. Loan & Trust Co., 84 F. 18 (1897). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hernandez v. Phoenix, City of (azd, 2021-05-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Hernandez v. Phoenix, City of
D. Ariz. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 84 F. 18 Supp. 3d 784, 791 (N.D.
cited Cited "see" State of Washington v. United States Department of Homeland Security
E.D. Wash. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See 8 C.F.R. 16 § 212.20. 17 The Public Charge Rule was set to take effect on October 15, 2019. 84 Fed. 18 Reg. at 41,292.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PULLMAN'S PALACE-CAR CO.
v.
AMERICAN LOAN & TRUST CO.
Dec 6, 1897.
84 F. 18
L. M. Cuthbert (Henry T. Rogers and D. B. Ellis, on brief), for appellant., E. E. Whitted (H. W. Hobson, on brief), for appellees.
Brewer, Sanborn, Thayer.
be allowed to show in evidence
PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the ingenióos and able argument of counsel for appellant, we are unable to perceive in this case other than an effort to establish as a preferential debt a claim for the stipulated compensation for the use of cars, or, as it is generally called, “car rental.” Under the authority of Thomas v. Car Co., 149 U. S. 95, 13 Sup. Ct. 824, this cannot be done. The order is therefore affirmed.