green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniels v. Allen, Warden, Central Prison of the State of North Carolina
See Ross v. Texas, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 742 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 ; Shepherd v. Florida, 341 U.S. 50 , 71 S.Ct. 549 , 95 L.Ed. 740 ; Brunson v. North Carolina, 333 U.S. 851 , 68 S.Ct. 634 , 92 L.Ed. 1132 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Suspension or Revocation of the License of Fichner
But the requirements of due process rarely “require auditory perception of all the evidence by each board member who votes.” Feist v. Rowe, 3 Cal.App.3d 404 , 83 Cal.Rptr. 465, 474 (1970); see also Pettiford v. South Carolina State Bd. of Educ., 218 S.C. 322 , 62 S.E.2d 780, 791 (1950) (declaring that general rule that administrative board must consider all evidence before rendering its decision does not mean that board must itself hear evidence but it must have evidence before it and consider such evidence when rendering its decision), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 920 , 71 S.Ct. 742 , 95 L.Ed. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rectangle Ranche Co.
v.
Board of Commissioners for the Buras Levee District
v.
Board of Commissioners for the Buras Levee District
No. 622.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1951.
John E. Jackson, Louis C. Guidry and Henry P. Dart, Jr. for petitioner. Leander H. Perez, A. Giffen Levy, Cullen R. Liskow and Harry F. Stiles, Jr. for respondents.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.