green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc. v. Hessen (In Re Teltronics Services, Inc.)
A defendant asserting a claim of estoppel must demonstrate “in what manner and to what extent, defendant relied on plaintiff’s inconsistent conduct and was prejudiced thereby.” Glenesk v. Guidance Realty Corp., 36 A.D.2d 852, 853 , 321 N.Y.S.2d 685, 687-88 (2d Dep’t. 1971) (citation omitted); accord, Lynn v. Lynn, 302 N.Y. 193, 205 , 97 N.E.2d 748, 754 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 72 , 96 L.Ed. 640 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
See Lynn v. Lynn, 302 N.Y. 193 , 97 N.E. 2d 748 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 72 , 96 L.Ed. 640 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
See Lynn v. Lynn, 302 N.Y. 193 , 97 N.E.2d 748 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 72 , 96 L.Ed. 640 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States ex rel. Giese
v.
Chamberlin, Commanding General
v.
Chamberlin, Commanding General
No. 10.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1951.
Albert E. Hallett argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., John F. Davis argued the cause for respondents., With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Beatrice Rosenberg.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Per Curiam:
The judgmeht is affirmed by
an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration, or decision of this case.