Wales ex rel. Wales Trucking Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 954 (1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Wales ex rel. Wales Trucking Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 954 (1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mississippi East, Inc. v. United States (pawd, 1969-07-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mississippi East, Inc. v. United States
W.D. Pa. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wales v. United States, 108 F.Supp. 928, 932 (N.D.Tex.1952), aff’d per curiam, 345 U.S. 954 , 73 S.Ct. 941 , 97 L.Ed. 1375 (1953) ; United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc., supra. . * * * It is to be recalled that all of the appellees, as well as both of the applicants, were parties to both proceedings ; were represented at all of the hearings, which were conducted at substantially the same times and places; and were given full opportunity to present all evidence they considered pertinent, to cross-examine witnesses and otherwise to protect their interests.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wales, doing business as Wales Trucking Co.
v.
United States
No. 723.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1953.
345 U.S. 954
T. S. Christopher for appellants. Solicitor General Cummings and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; R. E. Kidwell for the Newsom Truck Line et al.; Reagan Sayers for Tex-O-Kan Transportation Co.; and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for E. L. Farmer & Co. et al., appellees.
Published

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Per Curiam:

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 U. S. 33; United States v. Detroit Navigation Co., 326 U. S. 236, 241.