green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Conopco, Inc. v. May Department Stores Company
See Harad v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 204 F.2d 14, 19 , 97 USPQ 93 , 97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 914 , 74 S.Ct. 274 , 98 L.Ed. 410 (1953); see also Woodsmith Publishing Co., 904 F.2d at 1249 , 15 USPQ2d at 1057; Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 , 205 USPQ 969 , 978-79 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conopco, Inc. v. May Department Stores Co.
See Harad v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 204 F.2d 14, 19 , 97 USPQ 93 , 97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 914 , 74 S.Ct. 274 , 98 L.Ed. 410 (1953); see also Woodsmith Publishing Co., 904 F.2d at 1249 ,15 USPQ2d at 1057; Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 , 205 USPQ 969 , 978-79 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Borden Company
v.
Borden Company
No. 464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1953.
Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States. Stuart S. Ball for the Borden Company et al., L. Edward Hart, Jr. for the Bowman Dairy Co. et al., and Leo F. Tierney for the Beloit Dairy Co., appellees.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Probable jurisdiction noted.