green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Wemyss
The above facts, we think, establish that respondent’s business is an integral part of the Coca-Cola Company’s national system of distribution and is therefore subject to the Board’s jurisdiction under the rationale of the recent Supreme Court decision in Howell Chevrolet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 346 U.S. 482 , 74 S.Ct. 214 ; See American Bottling Co., 99 N.L.R.B. 345 , enforced 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 421 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 921 , 74 S.Ct. 306 ; cf. N.L.R.B. v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 5 Cir., 196 F.2d 424 , reversed on other points, 344 U.S. 344 , 73 S.Ct. 287 , 97 L.Ed. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Braniff Airways, Inc.
v.
Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment
v.
Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment
No. 476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 1954.
William J. Hotz and William J. Hotz, Jr. for appellant.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nebraska. Probable jurisdiction noted.