Ex parte Lincoln Elec. Co., 347 U.S. 902 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Ex parte Lincoln Elec. Co., 347 U.S. 902 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “‘By fraud we mean conscious wrongdoing, an intention to cheat or be dishonest.’ ”
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Page v. Carozza (In Re Carozza) (nyeb, 1994-05-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Page v. Carozza (In Re Carozza)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1994 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
by fraud we mean conscious wrongdoing, an intention to cheat or be dishonest.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex parte Lincoln Electric Co.
No. 322.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 1, 1954.
347 U.S. 902
Casper W. Ooms, Edward A. Haight, Dugald S. McDougall, John F. Oberlin, Thomas V. Koykka and James R. Stewart for petitioner., John T. Cahill, James A. Fowler, Jr., Richard R. Wolfe and Loftus E. Becker for the Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.