discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cell v. Barrow (In Re Barrow) The Harnett court added that “[f]or the purposes of res judicata, it is not necessary to ask if the plaintiff knew of his present claim at the time of the former judgment, for it is the existence of the present claim, not party awareness that controls.” Id. at 1313 ; see also Lester v. National Broadcasting Co. Inc., 217 F.2d 399, 400 (9th Cir.1954) cert. denied, 348 U.S. 954 , 75 S.Ct. 444 , 99 L.Ed. 746 (1955) (to permit repeated attacks on a judgment and to open up judgments years later for a new reason, or an expansion of facts concerning the same reason would soon lead to chaos); In r…