Perales v. United States, 751 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Perales v. United States, 751 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Green (scotus, 1993-04-05)
Statutes interpreted (leading-cases list)
#3 7 U.S.C. § 2029 cited 1× in this case · 7 total citations of statute
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Green
SCOTUS · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Perales v. United States, 751 F. 2d 95 (CA2 1984) (per curiam) ; Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. United States, 781 F. 2d 334 (CA3 1986); Arkansas by Scott v. Block, 825 F. 2d 1254 (CA8 1987). [] Both Texas and the Court of Appeals rely on Congress' authority to impose interest obligations on the States through specific statutes, such as the Medicaid Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1396b(d)(5), and the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. § 418 (j) (1982 ed.), to support the proposition that the Debt Collection Act extinguished the Federal Government's common-law right to collect prejudgment inte…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cesar A. Perales, Commissioner of Social Services of the State of New York
v.
United States of America and John R. Block, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
427.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 18, 1984.
751 F.2d 95
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

751 F.2d 95

Cesar A. PERALES, Commissioner of Social Services of the
State of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and John R. Block, Secretary,
United States Department of Agriculture,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 427, Docket 84-6249.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 30, 1984.
Decided Dec. 18, 1984.

Daniel D. Kaplan, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Paul M. Glickman, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Richard A. Simpson, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Rudolph Giuliani, U.S. Atty., for the S.D.N.Y., Thomas D. Warren, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Before LUMBARD, WINTER and PRATT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The United States appeals from that portion of Judge Brieant's order, 598 F.Supp. 19, granting summary judgment and holding that the Department of Agriculture is not authorized to charge interest on debts arising out of the Food Stamp Program, 7 U.S.C. Sec. 2011 to 7 U.S.C. Sec. 2029 (1982), due it from the Department of Social Services of the State of New York.

2

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court's opinion.