green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wolverine Insurance Company v. Phillips
United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 U.S. 47 [ 71 S.Ct. 111 , 95 L.Ed. 53 ]” It is of interest that the United States Supreme Court cited in support of the reversal the case of United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank which involved an attachment lien rather than the cases of United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 1956, 350 U.S. 1010 , 76 S. Ct. 646 , 100 L.Ed. 871 , and United States v. Colotta, 1955, 350 U.S. 808 , 76 S.Ct. 82 , 100 L.Ed. 725 , reversing United States v. Colotta, 1955, 224 Miss. 33 , 79 So.2d 474 , which involved mechanics’ liens.
discussed
Cited "see"
William Davis v. Thomas L. Jacobs, Commissioner of Probation and John T. Reed v. Carl Ajello, Attorney General of Connecticut
See Oaks, The "Original" Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Supreme Court, 1962 S.Ct.Rev. 153, 187, and n. 158 (distinguishing De Beers from House on the ground that the former involved property rights). 2 In Burwell v. Teets , 350 U.S. 808 , 76 S.Ct. 98 , 100 L.Ed. 726 (1955), and Rogers v. Teets , 350 U.S. 809 , 76 S.Ct. 98 , 100 L.Ed. 726 (1955), the Court granted writs of certiorari despite the refusals of the lower courts to grant certificates of probable cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ringwood Iron Mines, Inc.
See United States v. Oolotta, 1955, 350 U.S. 808 , 76 S.Ct. 82 , 100 L.Ed. 725 ; United States v. Acri, 1955, 348 U.S. 211 , 75 S.Ot. 239, 99 L.Ed. 264 ; United States v. Scovil, 1955, 348 U.S. 218 , 75 S.Ot. 244, 99 L.Ed. 271 ; United States v. Liverpool & London Globe Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McGehee
See, also, United States v. Colotta, 350 U.S. 808 ; United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., 350 U. S. 1010 ; United States v. Vorreiter, 355 U. S. 15 ; United States v. Hulley, 358 U. S. 66 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Block
v.
Block
v.
Block
No. 223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1955.
Henry B. Street and Philip R. Toomin for petitioner. Murray Seasongood and Robert P. Goldman for respondent.
Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Per Curiam:The petition for writ of certiorari is granted; the judgment is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of Ohio for clarification as to whether its decision rests on state or federal grounds. See Halvey v. Halvey, 330 U. S. 610.