green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
William A. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
See Smither & Co. v. Coles, 242 F.2d 220, 222 (D.C.Cir.) (the “history of the development” of the relevant code language provides additional intrinsic evidence of intent), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1429 (1957);* see also United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co., — U.S. —, ——, 112 S.Ct. 2102, 2108 , 119 L.Ed.2d 308 (1992) (examining the various changes the relevant language had undergone over time); compare Darby v. Cisneros, — U.S.—, —, 113 S.Ct. 2539, 2545 , 125 L.Ed.2d 113 (1993) (extrinsic evidence of intent (e.g., legislative history material…
cited
Cited "see"
Ceco Corp. v. Coleman
See Smither & Co. v. Coles, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 70 n.18, 242 F.2d 220 , 224 n.18, cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1957). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Karen Murphy v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority
(2×)
See Smither & Co. v. Coles, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 242 F.2d 220 , cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leslie F. Woodard v. United States
(2×)
See Washington v. United States, 100 U.S. App.D.C. 99, 243 F.2d 43 , cert. denied, 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1295 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1427 (1957). 6 On the issue here being discussed, appellant’s principal contention is that Simmons and Bailey should be applied with complete retroactivity because they were both “foreshadowed” by Jones .
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie E. Pendergrast v. United States
See Washington v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 99 , 243 F.2d 43 , cert. denied 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1295 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1427 (1957), affirming a conviction where the briefs and record squarely raised the point. 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Josephine Miskunas v. Union Carbide Corporation
(2×)
See Smither and Company, Inc. v. Coles, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 242 F.2d 220 (1957), cert. den. 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Vigor Fab, LLC
See also Smither & Co. v. Coles, 242 F2d at 220, 222-23 (DC Cir), cert den, 354 US 914 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weaver v. Mitchell
See also, Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 87 U.S. App.D.C. 57, 183 F.2d 811 , 23 A.L.R.2d 1366 (D.C.Cir.1950), cert. denied 340 U.S. 852 , 71 S.Ct. 80 , 95 L.Ed.2d 624 , overruled on other grounds in Smither & Co., Inc. v. Coles, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 242 F.2d 220 , cert. denied 354 U.S. 914 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1429 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Washington
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1957.
Joseph Sitnick and William R. Lichtenberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.