green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kendall v. Daily News Publishing Co.
Ed. 1295 ; see also One, Inc., v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371 , 78 S. Ct. 364 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kapiloff v. Dunn
As the Court said in New York Times, at 285: “In cases where that line must be drawn, the rule is that we ‘examine for ourselves the statements in issue and the circumstances under which they were made to see * * * whether they are of a character which the principles of the First Amendment, as adopted by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, protect.’ Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 U.S. 331, 335 , 66 S.Ct. 1029, 1031 , 90 L.Ed. 1295 ; see also One, Inc., v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371 , 78 S.Ct. 364 , 2 L.Ed.2d 352 ; Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372 , 78 S.Ct. 365 , 2 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Post v. OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY
BOUEY 2ND LT OREGON STATE POLICE KLAMATH FALLS OREGON 1100” ② New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 US 254, 279-280 , 84 S Ct 710, 726 , 11 L Ed2d 686, 706, 95 ALR2d 1412, 1435 (1964); Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, 403 US 29, 31 , 91 S Ct 1811, 1814 , 29 L Ed2d 296, 305 (1971). ③ ibid. ④ Id. at 271-72. ⑤ ORS 16.530 (2). ⑥ In New York Times v. Sullivan, supra, 376 US at 285 , the Court said: “This Court’s duty is not limited to the elaboration of constitutional principles; we must also in proper cases review the evidence to make certain that those principles have been constitutionally app…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
A. S. Abell Co. v. Barnes
Ed. 1295 ; see also One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U. S. 371 , 78 S. Ct. 364 , 2 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ferrara
See, e.g., Biggs v. United States, 246 F. 2 d 40, 43 (6 Cir. 1957), certiorari denied 355 U.S. 922 , 78 S.Ct. 364 , 2 L.Ed. 2 d 353 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 579.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1958.
Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants., John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Clay-tor, Martin A. Meyer, Jr. and Walter C. Scott, Jr. for the Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. et al., and John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for Cramet Inc., appellees.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.