green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Modell
See Solomon v. Scientific American, Inc., 125 F.R.D. 34, 36 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (citing United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (1958)).
cited
Cited "see"
Solomon v. Scientific American, Inc.
See United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (1958); McCormick on Evidence Sec. 91 (E.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trevor Dennis
See United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Gartner
See United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441, 447 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (1958); United States v. Andreadis, 234 F.Supp. 341, 345 (E.D.N.Y.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schmidt
See generally United States v. Brown, N.D.Ill.1972, 349 F.Supp. 420, 428 . [23] United States v. Tellier, 2 Cir., 255 F.2d 441, 447 , cert. denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 ; Wilcoxon v. United States, 10 Cir., 231 F.2d 384, 386 , cert. denied, 1956, 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 ; Robert M.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Howard W. George, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Donald E. Cote
See United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441 (2 Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 ; Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384 (10 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943 , 76 S.Ct. 834 , 100 L.Ed. 1469 ; United States v. Shibley, 112 F.Supp. 734, 742 (S.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mays
See also United States v. Tellier, 255 F. 2d 441 (2nd Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 62 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
See, e.g., United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441 (2d Cir.1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (client expected attorney to prepare letter to third party setting forth objections); Himmelfarb v. United States, 175 F.2d 924 (9th Cir.1949), cert. denied 338 U.S. 860 , 70 S.Ct. 103 , 94 L.Ed. 527 (attorney disclosed to accountant employee information provided by client on tax matter); see also D.R.E. 502(a)(5).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Elizabeth B. Duncan v. David B. Poythress
See, e. g., Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U.S. 167 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 53 (1959); Romero v. Coldwell, 455 F.2d 1163 (5th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge Martinez
Compare United States v. Malcolm, supra, and United States v. McCracken, 488 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1974), with United States v. Driscoll, supra 4 In United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 (1958), on which the Government relies, it was quite clear from the record that the party claiming the privilege expected the substance of the communication to be passed on to others
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph W. Janko v. United States
(2×)
Compare the comments of the Second Circuit in United States v. Tellier, 255 F.2d 441, 449-450 , certiorari denied 358 U.S. 821 , 79 S.Ct. 33 , 3 L.Ed.2d 62 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrison, Attorney General of Virginia
v.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
v.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
No. 127.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1958.
Albertis S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, David J. Mays, Henry T. Wickham and J. Segar Gravatt for appellants. Robert L. Carter and Oliver W. Hill for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc., and Thur-good Marshall and Spotswood W. Robinson, III, for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., appellees. With them on a motion to affirm were Jack Greenberg and Constance Baker Motley.
Published
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Probable jurisdiction noted.