green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence D. Rogers v. United States
See Dailey v. United States, 5 Cir. 1958, 261 F.2d 870 , cert. den’d 1959, 359 U.S. 969 , 79 S.Ct. 881 , 3 L.Ed.2d 836 ; Iiristiansand v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 319 F.2d 416 . 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarke
See Dailey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 870 , certiorari denied, 359 U.S. 969 , 79 S.Ct. 881 , 3 L.Ed.2d 836 .” In the present case, the arrest was not unduly delayed since less than a month elapsed between the first sale and the arrest.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wyche Larry Sizer
See Dailey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 870 , certiorari denied, 359 U.S. 969 , 79 S.Ct. 881 , 3 L.Ed.2d 836 . 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Byram v. United States
Long before the proliferation of tests and factors engulfed the capital gains field, this court made the common sense observation that the word “business” means “busyness; it implies that one is kept more or less busy, that the activity is an occupation.” Snell v. Commissioner, 97 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir.1938); see also Stern v. United States, 164 F.Supp. 847, 851 (E.D.La.1958) (“[A] court should not be quick to put a man in business .. . simply because he has been successful in earning extra income through a hobby or some other endeavor which takes relatively small part of his time.�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Ralph v. Vernon L. Pepersack, Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary
See, e. g., Dailey v. United States, 261 F.2d 870 (5 Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 969 , 79 S.Ct. 881 , 3 L.Ed.2d 836 (1959); Smith v. United States, 254 F.2d 751 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 937 , 78 S.Ct. 1388 , 2 F.Ed.2d 1552 (1958); United States v. Walker, 197 F.2d 287 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 877 , 73 S.Ct. 172 , 97 L.Ed. 679 (1952).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wahrhaftig
v.
Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
v.
Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
No. 352.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1959.
Petitioner pro se.., John J.. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Lawrence Ross, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.