Lewis v. Moore, 361 U.S. 232 (1960). · Go Syfert
Lewis v. Moore, 361 U.S. 232 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sams v. Beech Aircraft Corp. (ca9, 1980-08-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sams v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blue Mountain Construction Co. v. Werner, 270 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 931 , 80 S.Ct. 371 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960); 5 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 41.-05[3], at 41-81.
discussed Cited "see" Billy Jack Sams, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Billy Jack Sams, II v. Beech Aircraft Corp., a Corporation v. Thc Financial Corporation, Aeromarine, Inc. And Frances Nakamura, Administratrix of the Estate of Alan H. Allen, Third Party Judith Allen and Marc Allen, a Minor, by and Through His Prochein Ami, Judith Allen, and Frances Nakamura, Administratrix of the Estate of Alan H. Allen, Deceased v. Beech Aircraft Corp., Etc.
3rd Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blue Mountain Construction Co. v. Werner, 270 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 931 , 80 S.Ct. 371 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960); 5 Moore's Federal Practice P 41.05(3), at 41-81. 11 The district court believed that Rule 41(a)(2) prevented dismissal of the administratrix's claims against appellees' objections because THC's and Aeromarine's counterclaims could not remain pending for independent adjudication.
cited Cited "see" S. Victor Paturzo v. Home Life Insurance Company, a Body Corporate
4th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
Armstrong v. Frostie Co., 453 F.2d 914 (4 Cir. 1971) (dicta); see Blue Mountain Construction Co. v. Werner, 270 F.2d 305 (9 Cir. 1959), cert. den., 361 U.S. 931 , 80 S.Ct. 371 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LEWIS
v.
MOORE
No. 540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1960.
361 U.S. 232
Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.
Published
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.