green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Local 1497, National Federation of Federal Employees v. City & County of Denver
But see United States v. Department of Revenue of State of Illinois, 191 F.Supp. 723 (N.D.Ill.1961), vacated on other grounds 368 U.S. 30 , 82 S.Ct. 146 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 90 (1961), on remand 202 F.Supp. 757 (1962), affirmed per curiam, 371 U.S. 21 , 83 S.Ct. 117 , 9 L.Ed.2d 95 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
See Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States, 208 F. Supp. 661 ,(D.C.Mass.1962), affirmed 371 U.S. 26 , 83 S.Ct. 117 , 9 L.Ed.2d 95 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyd
See United States of America and Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Department of Revenue of State of Illinois, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 757 , affirmed without opinion 83 S.Ct. 117 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbia
(2×)
See, e. g., Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449, 451 , 83 S.Ct. 117 , 9 L.Ed.2d 97 (1963); Bush v. Texas, 372 U.S. 586, 590 , 83 S.Ct. 922 , 9 L.Ed.2d 958 (1963); Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U.S. 549, 568 , 67 S.Ct. 1409 , 91 L.Ed. 1666 (1947) 92 See note 54, supra 93 See note 54, supra 94 See note 54, supra 95 This the accused may undertake either by the production of witnesses of his own or by cross-examination of witnesses presented by the Government.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farmers Union Corp.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1962.
Ralph A. Yeo for petitioner.,
Solicitor General Cox,
, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Rothwacks for respondent.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.