Griffin v. Cnty. Sch. Bd. of Prince Edward Cnty., 377 U.S. 950 (1964). · Go Syfert
Griffin v. Cnty. Sch. Bd. of Prince Edward Cnty., 377 U.S. 950 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ray Roya (ca7, 1978-04-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ray Roya
7th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
The denial of a motion for a bill of particulars does not constitute an abuse of discretion “unless the deprivation of the information sought leads to the defendant’s inability adequately prepare his case, to avoid surprise at trial, or to avoid the later risk of double jeopardy.” United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 64 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); see also United States v. Micele, 327 F.2d 222 , 226 *392 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 1627 , 12 L.Ed.2d 496 ; Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
County School Board of Prince Edward County
No. 592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1964.
377 U.S. 950
Henry L. Marsh III, Robert L. Carter and S. W. Tucker on the motion.
Published

ante, p. 218. The motion of the petitioners that the judgment issue forthwith is granted.