green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ray Roya
The denial of a motion for a bill of particulars does not constitute an abuse of discretion “unless the deprivation of the information sought leads to the defendant’s inability adequately prepare his case, to avoid surprise at trial, or to avoid the later risk of double jeopardy.” United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 64 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); see also United States v. Micele, 327 F.2d 222 , 226 *392 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 1627 , 12 L.Ed.2d 496 ; Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
County School Board of Prince Edward County
v.
County School Board of Prince Edward County
No. 592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1964.
Henry L. Marsh III, Robert L. Carter and S. W. Tucker on the motion.
Published
ante, p. 218. The motion of the petitioners that the judgment issue forthwith is granted.