Eddington v. United States, 379 U.S. 818 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Eddington v. United States, 379 U.S. 818 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 · …in essence, the value of property is the amount of money for which it may be exchanged, i.e., the sales price. ⚠ not in text
25 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Killen v. Logan County Commission (wva, 1982-09-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Killen v. Logan County Commission (2×)
W. Va. · 1982 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
in essence, the value of property is the amount of money for which it may be exchanged, i.e., the sales price.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Phillips Lee Saunders (2×)
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Eddington, 328 F.2d 760, 762 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 818 , 85 S.Ct. 35 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eddington
v.
United States
No. 88.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 818
John I. Heise, Jr., and Alfred L. Scanlan for petitioner.. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice .Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: West Virginia Supreme Court (2)

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.