green
Positive treatment
0.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
(2×)
But see Haba v. Cuff, Ohio App., 28 Ohio Op.2d 266 , 201 N.E.2d 343 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 558 , rehearing denied, 380 U.S. 927 , 85 S.Ct. 883 , 13 L.Ed.2d 815 (1965); City of Fort Worth v. Johnson, 388 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.1964). [1] Obviously, the zoning board cannot attend to every conceivable violation.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Hod Carriers' Building & General Laborers' Union of America, Local No. 652, Afl-Cio
See Sakrete of Northern California, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964), C.D. 379 U.S. 961 , 85 S.Ct. 649 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 , rehearing denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 883 , 13 L.Ed.2d 814 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry
v.
Mississippi City of El Paso v. Simmons Stanford v. Texas Cox v. Louisiana Goldner v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York Gianfrancesco v. Ohio Kehoe v. Boyle, Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Locklin, dba Radiant Color Co. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc. Estes v. United States Spector v. United States
v.
Mississippi City of El Paso v. Simmons Stanford v. Texas Cox v. Louisiana Goldner v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York Gianfrancesco v. Ohio Kehoe v. Boyle, Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Locklin, dba Radiant Color Co. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc. Estes v. United States Spector v. United States
No. 6; No. 38; No. 40; No. 49; No. 415; Nos. 510 and 542; No. 547; No. 556; No. 581; No. 601; No. 614.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1965.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar