discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio See also NLRB v. District Council of Painters # 48, 340 F.2d 107 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U. S. 914 , 85 S.Ct. 1539 , 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965) (Sec. 8(b)(4) violation premised on statements by union representative that struck manufacturers' materials were "unfair"). 25 Nor does the Trial Examiner's finding that Van Arsdale had no actual intent to induce or encourage the work stoppages take the statements outside of Sec. 8(b)(4).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers See also NLRB v. District Council of Painters # 48, 340 F.2d 107 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U. S. 914 , 85 S.Ct. 1539 , 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965) (§ 8(b)(4) violation premised on statements by union representative that struck manufacturers’ materials were “unfair”).