green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Energy Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Power Auth. of the State of New York v. Federal Power Comm’n, 339 F.2d 269, 275 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 1766 , 14 L.Ed.2d 699 (1965); Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation Dist. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 160 F.2d 782, 786 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 765 , 68 S.Ct. 72 , 92 L.Ed. 351 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miriam J. Wolf v. Curtis Barkes
(2×)
Compare Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 333 F.2d 327, 347 (2 Cir. 1964) (dissenting opinion), cert. granted, Holt v. Alleghany Corp., 381 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 1772 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consolo
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
No. 992.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1965.
William J. Lippman and Amy Scupi for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Irwin A. Seibel, Donald L. Hardison, Milan C. Miskovsky and Walter H. Mayo III for the Federal Maritime Commission et al., and Odell Kominers for Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A., respondents.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.