cited Cited "but see" Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. But cf. Universal-Rundle Corp. v. FTC, 352 F.2d 831 (7 Cir. 1965), cert. granted, 385 U.S. 809 , 87 S.Ct. 31 , 17 L.Ed.2d 51 (1966).

discussed Cited "see" Parrish v. Civil Service Commission (2×) Although two cases now pending before the United States Supreme Court (Camara v. Municipal Ct. of San Francisco, No. 92; See v. City of Seattle, No. 180 [prob. juris. noted (1966) 385 U.S. 808 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 50 , 87 S.Ct. 31 ]]) raise the question of whether the Frank doctrine should be overruled, we may assume for present purposes that the court will adhere to its holding in Frank since, as we explain below, we do not find that holding controlling under the circumstances here before us.