green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb Menon
(2×)
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966) (holding sufficient an indictment which did not cite the statute violated but which “advised the appellants of the essential elements of the offenses with which they were charged and stated facts showing the illegal aspects of the importation.” The court explained that the claim of insufficiency was “ ‘made in a mood of teehni-calism appropriate only to an era now fortunately past.’ ” Id. (citations omitted).) As we explain in the margin, the cases upon which Menon …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Menon
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S. Ct. 401 (1966) (holding sufficient an indictment which did not cite the statute violated but which "advised the appellants of the essential elements of the offenses with which they were charged and stated facts showing the illegal aspects of the importation." The court explained that the claim of insufficiency was "`made in a mood of technicalism appropriate only to an era now fortunately past.'" Id. (citations omitted).) As we explain in the margin, the cases upon which Menon relies are distinguishable, bec…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Austain Toner, Colm Murphy
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 15-16 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Harvey R. Miller, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ira Haupt & Co., a Limited Partnership, Bankrupt v. New York Produce Exchange
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 15 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966); Olsen v. Realty Hotel Corp., 210 F.2d 785, 786-87 (2d Cir. 1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Carlton Wansley v. A. E. Slayton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
See, United States v. Bowe (2d Cir. 1966) 360 F.2d 1, 12 , cert, denied 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 , reh. denied 386 U.S. 969 , 87 S.Ct. 1040 , 18 L.Ed.2d 127 , where the Court very clearly marks out the difference between “prejudicial information during the trials” and prejudicial publicity antedating trial in distinguishing United States v. Accardo (7th Cir. 1962) 298 F.2d 133 , and Coppedge v. United States (1959), 106 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 272 F.2d 504 , cert, denied 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 52 , both of which involved “exposure of jurors to prejudicial i…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fried
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 14-15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966).” United States v. Acarino, 408 F.2d 512, 515 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2101 , 23 L.Ed.2d 746 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Corallo
See generally United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 11 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Acarino
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 14-15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonetti
See United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 7 (2d *478 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966); United States v. Kelly, supra, 349 F.2d at 778 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erazo, Alex
REV. 689, 702 (194lXdetermination of whether relevant evidence has sufficient probative force to justify time taken to offer it requires considering difficulty in establishing evidentiary fact, how offered fact will fit in with other facts already in evidence, how this fact affects major issues, and whether evidence merely cumulative); see also United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 961 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Stearns Giese
See, e. g., United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 14 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966) (In prosecution for conspiracy to blow up Statue of Liberty, where defendant on direct examination “placed his character in issue and attempted to portray himself as opposed to all forms of violence, it was proper on cross-examination to question him concerning the guns [found in his possession] and introduce them, for the purpose of rebutting, i. e., contradicting his self-portrait.”) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Emerito Torres
See, e. g., United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966); Rule 403, Proposed Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Torres
See, e.g., United States v. Bowe, 360 F.2d 1, 15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 961 (1966); Rule 403, Proposed Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 1966.
385 U.S. 961
Joseph Earl Jackson for petitioner., Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.